An Update on Pelvic Inflammatory Disease

We last covered PID and TOA on the podcast in February 2019 — and since then, as with our gonorrhea and chlamydia update, have some new updates to reflect the 2021 CDC Treatment Guidelines.

What is PID/TOA? 

  • PID: pelvic inflammatory disease 

    • This is a wide variety of inflammatory disorders of the upper female genital tract, including: 

      • Endometritis

      • Salpingitis

      • TOA: tubo-ovarian abscess

      • Pelvic peritonitis 

    • Caused by many infectious diseases. 

      • Most common: N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis (gonorrhea and chlamydia)

        • 50% of PID diagnoses test positive for GC/CT, though this proportion is decreasing.

    • Other organisms that can be implicated:

      • Anaerobes, 

      • G. vaginalis 

      • H. influenzae

      • Enteric GNRs

      • Strep agalactiae

      • Cytomegalovirus 

      • Trichomonas (Trichomonas vaginalis)

      • Mycoplasima hominis and M. genitalium

      • Ureaplasma urealyticum

Diagnosis of PID

  • Can be difficult because of many vague symptoms, and some are asymptomatic 

  • Differential diagnosis is broad for abdominopelvic pain: 

    • Appendicitis 

    • Ectopic pregnancy

    • Ovarian torsion or ovarian cysts

    • Diverticulitis

    • Functional GI pain, IBS, IBD

    • Etc. etc. etc. 

  • A presumptive dx should be made, and treatment started,

    • In sexually active women and those at risk for STIs experiencing pelvic/lower abdominal pain, if no other cause for illness can be identified,

    • and if they have 1 or more of these minimum clinical criteria

    • Cervical motion tenderness 

    • Uterine tenderness 

    • Adnexal tenderness  

  • One or more of the following can be used to enhance specificity of the minimal clinical criteria: 

    • Oral temp > 101 F (38.3) 

    • Abnormal cervical mucopurulent discharge or friability 

    • Presence of abundant WBC on saline microscopy of vaginal fluid 

    • Elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate 

    • Elevated C-reactive protein 

    • Laboratory documentation of cervical infection with N. gonorrhoeae or C. trachomatis 

  • Even more specific criteria can include:

  • Endometrial biopsy with histopathologic evidence of endometritis 

  • TVUS or MRI showing thickened, fluid-filled tubes with or without free fluid or tubo-ovarian complex

  • Laparoscopic findings of PID (Fitz-Hugh-Curtis syndrome

What should I do if I think someone has PID?

  • Testing:

  • HIV

    • Testing recommended by CDC “in all persons seeking STI testing who do not have a known diagnosis of HIV.” 

  • GC/CT

    • 50% will test positive, so they are high yield for PID testing.

    • NAAT testing is preferred method.

      • Patient self-collected swabs are just as accurate as clinician-collected.

      • First void urine is most sensitive; decreases with later voids during the day.

        • Urine testing may miss over 400k infections per year in USA - vaginal swab testing should be offered first, and patient-collected may help improve acceptability.

  • Imaging

    • Not recommended outright by CDC in PID evaluation.

    • Will frequently be part of your evaluation in a differential diagnosis

      • TVUS - may continue to have cervical motion tenderness, can demonstrate TOA. Can also demonstrate other GYN pathologies.

      • CT/MRI - unlikely to demonstrate specific findings for PID outside of large TOAs.

  • Treatment:

    • Primary Considerations: 

  • Choice of medication:

    • Treatment is empiric, requiring broad spectrum coverage of likely pathogens

    • All treatment types should be effective against gonorrhea and chlamydia 

  • Need for hospitalization:

    • Recommended if:

      • A surgical emergency (ie. appendicitis) cannot be excluded

      • Presence of tubo-ovarian abscess 

      • Pregnancy

      • Severe illness including nausea, vomiting, or high fever,

      • Inability to tolerate or follow outpatient regimen

      • Failed outpatient therapy based on follow up

    • Parenteral treatments

      • Ceftriaxone (1g IV q24 hrs) + doxycycline (100 mg oral or IV q12hrs) + metronidazole (500mg oral or IV q12h).

      • Cefoxitin (2g IV q6hrs) + doxycycline (100mg oral or IV q12hrs) 

      • Cefotetan (2g IV q12h) + doxycycline (100mg oral or IV q12hrs)

    • Because of pain associated with IV infusion, doxycycline should be given orally whenever possible.

    • Oral and IV doxycycline and metronidazole have similar bioavailability

  • Alternative regimens pending allergies and antibiotic availability:

    • Clindamycin (900 mg IV q8hrs) + gentamicin (2mg/kg loading dose IV or IM, then maintenance of 1.5mg/kg every 8 hrs, or single daily dosing of 3-5mg/kg) 

    • Ampicillin-sulbactam (Unasyn) 3g IV q6hrs + doxycycline 100mg q12hrs  

  • Goal of parenteral therapy will be to transition to oral antibiotics within 24-48 hours if clinical improvement.

    • Those with TOA should have at least 24 hours of inpatient observation

    • IM/Oral treatment - For continuation of inpatient treatment, or start here in those with mild-to-moderate symptoms of acute PID. 

  • Clinical outcomes are similar to those treated with IV therapy, but if women don’t respond in 72 hours, should be re-evaluated and treated with IV

    • Ceftriaxone 500mg IM x1 + doxycycline 100mg BID x14 days + metronidazole 500 mg BID x14 days 

    • Cefoxitin 2g IM + Probenecid 1g orally + doxycyline 100mg BID x14 days + metronidazole 500mg BID x14 days 

    • Some other 3rd generation cephalosporin + doxy + metronidazole 

  • If starting with outpatient treatment, improvement should be documented by follow up within 72 hours.

    • If no improvement has occurred, then hospitalization, assessment of the antimicrobial regimen, and considering potential additional diagnostics (imaging, laparoscopy) are indicated.

  • Retesting should occur at 3 months after treatment, regardless of treatment of sex partners, to assess for reinfection.

    • Patients should refrain from sex until treatment is completed, symptoms resolved, and sex partners have been treated.

    • Sex partners within previous 60 days of patients with PID should also be treated presumptively for gonorrhea and chlamydia

      • This is regardless of PID etiology or pathogens isolated 

      • Consider expedited partner therapy (EPT).

Managing TOAs 

  • Surgical drainage indicated if:

    • Failure to respond to treatment within 48-72 hours 

    • Clinical decline (ie. becoming septic) 

  • Likelihood of need for surgical intervention is related to the size of TOA: 

    • 60% of those with abscess >10cm 

    • 30% in 7-9cm 

    • 15% in those of 4-6 cm

Special considerations for treatment in certain populations:

  • Pregnancy

    • Pregnant patients with PID are at high risk of morbidity, pregnancy loss, preterm delivery.

    • Hospitalization and consultation with ID are recommended.

  • Persons with HIV

    • Patients with HIV may be more likely to have TOA, though symptoms are similar overall to those without HIV.

    • No data currently to suggest more aggressive therapy is needed in patients with HIV.

  • If patient has an IUD:

    • IUD is not required to be removed with a diagnosis of PID.

    • However, if there is no clinical improvement in 48-72 hours, then should consider removing the IUD.

Fundamentals of Laparoscopy: Part I

Today we’re joined by Dr. Merima Ruhotina, a minimally-invasive gynecologic surgery fellow at Yale New Haven Hospital in Connecticut. Meri has prepared for us a big series on laparoscopy in gynecology covering many of the fundamentals, particularly to help with the aptly named “Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery” exam that ABOG began to require in 2020.

Meri is an excellent note taker and we’ll share her episode notes with each episode!

(C) Dr. Merima Ruhotina

(C) Dr. Merima Ruhotina

(C) Dr. Merima Ruhotina

(C) Dr. Merima Ruhotina

(C) Dr. Merima Ruhotina

(C) Dr. Merima Ruhotina

Evidence-Based GYN Surgery

Check out: https://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(18)30583-0/fulltext

Remember the evidence-based C-section? Turns out, there is also good evidence for gyn surgery practices!

Preoperative - Includes things that are part of the ERAS protocol

  1. Patient Education 

    • Two randomized control trials 

    • There was some potential association between preoperative patient education and improved outcomes (low level evidence) —> perhaps some decrease in length of stay and pain.

  2. Bowel Prep

    • Minimally invasive gyn surgery:

      • Strong evidence that oral mechanical bowel prep should not be used.

    • In those with high risk of colorectal resection:

      • Based on colorectal surgery evidence, oral mechanical bowel prep alone is not effective 

      • Use of one of the following regimens can be considered: (moderate level evidence) 

        • Oral bowel prep AND oral antibiotic 

        • Oral antibiotic alone

  3. Surgical site infection bundles - high level of evidence

  4. Glucose management 

    • Goal of <180 mg/dL (high level of evidence) 

  5. Diet

    • Reduce fasting - may ingest solids until 6 hours prior to anesthesia induction and clear liquids until 2 hours prior to induction 

      • High level of evidence 

    • Carbohydrate loading - routine carbohydrate loading is recommended (moderate level of evidence) 

      • May ingest 2-3 hours up to induction of anesthesia - can include things like apple juice, ensure clear, etc. 

  6. Pre-anesthesia medication 

    • Pain:

      • Combination of acetaminophen, COX-2 inhibitor (celecoxib, for example), and/or gabapentin - level of evidence is high!

    • Nausea:

      • Scopolamine, midazolam, or gabapentin (high level of evidence) 

  7. VTE prophylaxis - moderate evidence 

    • Overall low rates of VTE in general, but preoperative intermittent pneumatic compression alone for patients undergoing MIS or laparotomy for benign disease

    • Weak evidence from observational studies supports adding preoperative pharmacologic prophylaxis for patients undergoing laparotomy for gynecologic malignancies  

Intra-operative 

  1. Drains 

    • Routine NG tube - associated with patient discomfort and no known benefit (high level of evidence) - from the ERAS Society 

    • Routine peritoneal drains - not recommended routinely in gyn or onc surgery including cases with lymphadenectomy or bowel surgery

      • 2017 Cochrane Database showed drainage was not associated with reduced rates of lymphocyst formation. However, use of surgical drains increased rates of symptomatic lymphocyst formation when the pelvic peritoneum was left open 

      • Overall, moderate evidence  

  2. Antibiotic prophylaxis

    • Given within 1 hour prior to incision per CDC and ACOG; redose prophylactic antibiotics for long procedures (ie. Ancef 3-4 hours after incision)

      • Level of evidence is high

  3. Skin prep

    1. Ideally use 2% chlorhexidine and 70% isopropyl alcohol solution (high level of evidence) 

  4. Blood transfusion (for hemoglobin 6-10) and fluids to maintain intraoperative euvolemia

  5. Maintain normothermia 

  6. Pain management - liposomal bupivicaine for laparotomy cases (moderate)  

Postoperative

  1. Early mobilization - moderate level of evidence 

    • Has been shown to be beneficial and to avoid prolonged bedrest; basically meaning out off bed and mobilizing within 24 hours of surgery 

      • Reduces PEs and VTEs, also may protect against muscle atrophy and deconditioning 

  2. Early alimentation 

    • Postoperative feeding - within 24 hours of surgery (can be as early as 4 hours after surgery with or without bowel resection

    • Two systematic reviews and 1 meta-analysis - early feeding is safe, well-tolerated and results in earlier return of bowel function and shorter LOS 

  3. Early urinary bladder catheter removal (mod level evidence) 

    • Catheter use for < 24 hours, but appropriate to consider fall risk and necessity of urine output monitoring 

    • Uncomplicated surgeries: consider removal at 6 hours to balance rate of infection vs retention 

    • Complicated: morning after may be more appropriate (ie. urogyn or gyn onc cases) 

  4. Prevention of ileus and accelerate return of bowel function

    • Use of postop laxatives (recommended for gyn surg, low level of evidence) 

    • Chewing gum (high level of evidence) 

    • Alvimopan (novel peripheral u-opioid antagonist) - may not be beneficial in benign gyn 

      • However, may decrease ileus in ovarian cancer surgery and can be considered for use in patients undergoing bowel resection  

  5. Early IV fluid discontinuation 

    • Discontinue maintenance IV fluids within 12-24 hours following surgery, especially with early PO intake (low level of evidence) 

      • Urine output as low as 20 mL/hour

        • Can be normal post op stress response 

        • Intervention not required 

  6. Postoperative VTE: 

    • Mechanical prophylaxis for duration of hospitalization in all gyn surg patients 

    • Mechanical and/or pharmacologic prophy for gyn onc surgical patients (high level of evidence) 

      • Additionally, for oncology cases with laparotomy, should extend VTE prophylaxis for 4 weeks following surgery 



Adnexal Masses Part III: Germ Cell Tumors

Germ cell tumors are our next foray into these adnexal masses. They comprise 20-25% of ovarian neoplasms, can be benign or malignant, and occur generally in younger women: between ages 10-30 years.

Many of these for CREOGs are distinguished by specific tumor markers and specific histopathology. We’ve put a brief table together here to help with the episode and get some of those visual references!

(C) CREOGs Over Coffee (2019)

Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: The Basics

Today we talk through the varied etiologies and a basic workup for a common GYN complaint: abnormal uterine bleeding. ACOG PB 128 makes for good companion reading for women of reproductive age.

The terminology of AUB has changed quite a bit, and you may still hear older terms being used. “Dysfunctional uterine bleeding” or DUB has fallen out of favor, as have terms such as metrorrhagia or menorrhagia, yielding instead to simpler terminology such as prolonged menstrual bleeding and heavy menstrual bleeding, respectively. The terms such as oligomenorrhea (bleeding cycles > 35 days apart) and polymenorrhea (cycles < 21 days apart) are also in use to some degree.

Heavy bleeding is difficult to discern, but for research purposes has been described as >80cc blood loss per cycle. In clinical practice, this is obviously impractical, so we rely on subjective descriptions of heavy bleeding to guide care.

The biggest takeaways from this episode include the PALM-COIEN classification of bleeding by FIGO, as well as the common culprits of bleeding by age group. Remember also the criteria for working up for disorders of coagulation, which we’ve put here (though contained in the practice bulletin).

Stay tuned for future episodes about the treatments of these various etiologies, or check out our friends at The OBG Project for excellent summaries of guidelines and new literature!

ACOG PB 128

ACOG PB 128

ACOG PB 128